View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Team Topologies Interaction ModesAccountability LadderAlignment MappingResponsibility Poker
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Operations Accountability Ladder |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 20-45 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 1-8 | 4-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |