Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Team Cognitive Load Assessment Stakeholder Salience Model Alignment Mapping Stakeholder Mapping

Criterion	Team Design Team Cognitive Load Assessment	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Facilitation Alignment Mapping	Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping
Purposedifferent	When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.	When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Medium	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	60-90 min	60-90 min	1-2 h	60–90 min
Participantsdifferent	3-12	3-6	4-12	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Cognitive Load Profile, Action List	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions	Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap	TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation	StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange

Add more methods