View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Team Cognitive Load AssessmentSoft Systems MethodologyResponsibility PokerAccountability Ladder
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Cognitive Load Assessment |  Systems Thinking Soft Systems Methodology |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Operations Accountability Ladder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list. | Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 0.5-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 5-15 | 3-10 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Cognitive Load Profile, Action List | Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes |
Tagsno overlap | TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis | Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam |