View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Cognitive Load Assessment |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 60–90 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 2-8 | 5-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Cognitive Load Profile, Action List | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Spotify Model Map, Action List |
Tagsno overlap | TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis |