methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team Cognitive Load Assessment with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Cognitive Load Assessment
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
When a team juggles too many domains, systems, or handoffs, it measures mental overload as an organizational problem. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a cognitive-load profile and action list.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
60-90 min20-45 min45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-121-84-123-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Cognitive Load Profile, Action ListOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tags1 shared
TeamComplexityImprovementDiagnosis
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods