View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 60-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |