View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Example Mapping |  Agile Working Agreements |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-7 | 3-12 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | TeamCollaborationAgile | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |