methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Team Charter.
Facilitation
Team Charter
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h60-90 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-124-102-103-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Team Charter, Working Norms, Role NotesProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCollaboration
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods