View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-90 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | 10-50 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |