methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend20-35 min60-90 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder1-53-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentTest Card with a pre-set thresholdPrioritization Canvas, Hypothesis BacklogClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods