View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Team Charter | ![]() Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-7 | 3-12 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |



