View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Example Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-7 | 3-15 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |