View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Decision Making DACI |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 2-10 | 3-10 Kunden | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | AutonomyRolesTeam |