methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend1-2 h15-45 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-81-31-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
Add more methods