methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Teach-back.
Knowledge Modeling
Teach-back
Paper illustration for Feynman Technique.
Knowledge Modeling
Feynman Technique
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations.The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend45–75 min5-20 min20-60 min
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus StakeholderTeam members involved2-81
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Team API Document4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsUnderstanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning GapsPlain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
LearningUnderstandingCommunication
LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding
Add more methods