View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 15-200 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | AutonomyRolesTeam |