View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 20–45 min | 20-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Small cross-functional group | 1 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery |