View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 20-60 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 20-500+ | 1 | 6-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | LearningDialogueFacilitation |