View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Teach-back | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Operations MORT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 2-6 h | 20-60 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-8 | 1 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | RiskRoot causeSafety | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident |



