methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Teach-back.
Knowledge Modeling
Teach-back
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
5-20 min45–75 min45-90 minHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
2-8Team members involved3-12Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
LearningUnderstandingCommunication
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods