View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile T-Shirt Sizing |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Agile Ideal Days |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen | 15-60 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 6-30 Experten | 2-9 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRoadmap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | EstimationEffortAgile | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |