View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile T-Shirt Sizing | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Product Strategy GIST Planning | ![]() Decision Making Wideband Delphi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | 1-4 h or multiple rounds |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 6-30 Experten | 3-10 | 4-12 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus Notes |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRoadmap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | EstimationExpertsForecasting |



