methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Paper illustration for Wideband Delphi.
Decision Making
Wideband Delphi
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Purposedifferent
Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 hlaufend1-4 h or multiple rounds1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-122-124-12 Experten4-12
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
System Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsThroughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing RulesEstimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus NotesLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
EstimationForecastingFlow
EstimationExpertsForecasting
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Add more methods