methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration for Trade-off Analysis.
Decision Making
Trade-off Analysis
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-90 min45-120 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-122-82-83-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
System Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsConstraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesTrade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted DownsidesCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods