methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
Purposedifferent
Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-120 min2-4 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-122-63-82-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
System Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsIceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
Add more methods