methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-120 min45-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-122-62-53-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
System Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods