View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy McKinsey 7S | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 60–90 min | 2-4 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-8 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | 7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |



