View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Systems Thinking Wardley Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Wardley Mapping makes visible where an offering stands today and where it can evolve. The method connects user need, value chain, and evolution stages into a strategic basis for platform, build, or buy decisions. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 1-2 h | 1-3 h | 60–90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 4-12 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Wardley Map, Strategic Options, Evolution Notes | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | StrategySystems thinkingDynamics | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange |