View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Surveys |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 60-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | 4-12 | Nutzertraffic | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tags1 shared | QuantitativeResearchValidation | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |