methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Design Thinking as a learning loop: an observation notebook, a focused problem statement, different idea sketches, a cardboard prototype and user-test notes. Feedback leads to new understanding.
Innovation
Design Thinking
Paper illustration: scenarios and architectural decisions are connected to identified risks.
Architecture
ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service.ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage30 min Setup, dann laufend1 Tag bis mehrere WochenSeveral meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope
Participantsdifferent
50+1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone4-10Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsRAID Log, Status Report SourceProblem Statement, Prototype, Test LearningsPrioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations
Tagsno overlap
QuantitativeResearchValidation
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
InnovationPrototypeResearch
ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders
Add more methods