methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
50+5-12 Interviews5-12 Interviews1-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsInterview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesCompleted Experiment Canvas, Success Metric
Tagsno overlap
QuantitativeResearchValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
Add more methods