methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage30-60 min je Interview30-60 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
50+5-12 Interviews1-5Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsCompleted Experiment Canvas, Success MetricClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
QuantitativeResearchValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods