methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Option Framing.
Decision Making
Option Framing
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question.The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage45-120 min1-2 h45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
50+3-83-102-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsOption Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision InputsTOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority ActionsTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
QuantitativeResearchValidation
OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison
StrategyAnalysisOptions
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods