View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Innovation Design Thinking | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 1-4 Wochen | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 4-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | 6-30 Experten | 4-10 | 5-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | QuantitativeResearchValidation | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | InnovationPrototypeResearch | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation |



