methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage1-4 Wochen30-60 min je Interview25-40 min
Participantsdifferent
50+3-10 Kunden5-12 Interviews1-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsLearning Card with evidence and next action
Tags1 shared
QuantitativeResearchValidation
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
Add more methods