methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Purposedifferent
When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
3-14 Tage1-4 Wochen30-60 min je Interview30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
50+3-10 Kunden5-12 Interviews1-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Survey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsCompleted Experiment Canvas, Success Metric
Tags1 shared
QuantitativeResearchValidation
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
Add more methods