View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Decision Making RAPID | ![]() Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | 1-3 | 3-12 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | QuantitativeResearchValidation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DecisionRolesGovernance | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |



