View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategy Map |  Growth A/B Testing |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Strategy Map translates strategy into a few connected objectives across perspectives such as finance, customers, processes, and learning. This makes visible which capabilities and activities are meant to drive which results. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h workshop plus review | 1-4 Wochen | 1-5 Tage | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 1-6 | Nutzertraffic | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Strategy Map, Objective Set, Cause-Effect Hypotheses | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentExecutionGoalsCausality | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |