View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategy Execution LoopStarfish RetrospectiveArchitecture Decision RecordSprint Retrospective
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Sprint Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 4-12 | 1-3 | Scrum Team |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Improvement actions, Team agreements |
Tagsno overlap | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning |