View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategy Execution LoopSailboat RetrospectiveArchitecture Decision RecordSprint Retrospective
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile Sprint Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 4-12 | 1-3 | Scrum Team |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Improvement actions, Team agreements |
Tagsno overlap | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning |