View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategy Execution LoopROAM BoardATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method)Stakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Architecture ATAM (Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | ATAM helps teams weigh architecture decisions when quality goals compete. The team considers business goals, stakeholder expectations, and technical decisions together. The evaluation shows which risks need further investigation. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 3-15 | Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log | ROAM Board, Owner List | Prioritized quality scenarios in a utility tree, Architecture risks with reasoning and assumptions, Sensitivity and trade-off points, Findings report with open investigations | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ArchitectureQualityRiskTradeoffsStakeholders | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |



