Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Strategy Execution Loop Decision Rights Mapping Stakeholder Salience Model Stakeholder Mapping

Criterion	Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop	Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping	Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model	Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping
Purposedifferent	The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning.	In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.	When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.	When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.
Complexitydifferent	High	Medium	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews	90-180 min	60-90 min	60–90 min
Participantsdifferent	5-12	4-12	3-6	2-8
Formatdifferent	Workshop + async	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log	Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement	Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class	Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap	ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance	DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility	StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance	StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange

Add more methods