Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion	Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning	Agile Starfish Retrospective	Agile 4Ls Retrospective	Agile Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent	It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes.	When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.	When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.	When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Low	Low	Low
Timedifferent	90-180 min	45-90 min	45–75 min	30-60 min
Participantsdifferent	4-12	4-12	Team members involved	3-10
Formatsame	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop	Workshop
Outputdifferent	Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory	Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments	4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions	Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap	CadenceGovernanceExecution	RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam	RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam	RetrospectiveTeamReflection