View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningStakeholder Salience ModelROAM BoardAlignment Mapping
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 60-90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-6 | 3-15 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | ROAM Board, Owner List | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |