View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningStakeholder MappingRAID LogStakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 60–90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |