View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningSailboat RetrospectiveArchitecture Decision Record4Ls Retrospective
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 1-3 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |