View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Operations Kepner-Tregoe |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 2-8 h | 90-180 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |