View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningDecision Rights MappingAssumption SurfacingDIBB
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 90-180 min | 45-90 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |