View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningBalanced ScorecardArchitecture Decision Recordarc42
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 15-45 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | StrategyMetricsExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |