View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningAssumption SurfacingStrategy Execution LoopDIBB
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 45-90 min | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 5-12 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |